Senator Accuses Anti-Trump Witness Vindman of Trying to Profit from Attacks on President

A major witness in the 2019 impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump is being accused of trying to make a hefty profit off the war in Ukraine, using his anti-Trump credentials to bolster his case.

Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee leveled the charge against retired Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman.

Vindman portrayed himself as a whistleblower trying to protect the integrity of government when he leaked information about a call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and subsequently testified against Trump in his impeachment.

Vindman’s staunchest critics painted him as a malcontent who was solely out for himself.

Blackburn told Fox News that Vindman remains an “opportunist” to this day, and is trying to turn a profit from the war in Ukraine.

Trending:

Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit

“When conservatives speak the truth, the mainstream media panics and desperately attempts to provide cover for the left. They did this for Alexander Vindman, just like they did for Hunter Biden, Dr. Fauci and teachers unions,” Blackburn said, referring to Vindman’s support from the media against Trump.

“Alexander Vindman has always been a political activist and opportunist masquerading behind his career. He saw an opening for personal fame and profited by exploiting the media’s outrage against President Trump,” she said.

Blackburn said that since going public with his allegations against Trump, “Vindman has spent the last three years on MSNBC and CNN attacking Republicans.”

“Now, new revelations suggest Vindman could be profiting off the war in Ukraine, just as he did by speaking out against the Trump administration,” Blackburn said.

Did Vindman attempt to profit from his attacks against Trump?

Yes: 0% (0 Votes)

No: 0% (0 Votes)

The website Human Events last week claimed that through the company he heads, Vindman was trying to grab a $12 million contract for Ukraine to essentially serve as an in-country middleman between NATO and Ukrainian forces.

The report said there was a dispute over payments, but it was not clear if an agreement was reached or how much that agreement was worth.

On the day after the report, a since-deleted tweet appeared from…


Source

More Reading

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *