Harvey Weinstein’s Worst Nightmare: Mel Gibson May Take the Stand Against Him at New Trial

Actor Mel Gibson can be called as a witness in the upcoming rape trial of producer Harvey Weinstein, a judge ruled Friday.

Prosecutors want Gibson to testify to support the claims of a woman known as Jane Doe 3, who claims she was sexually assaulted after she gave Weinstein a massage at his hotel in 2010, according to Variety.

Weinstein’s trial is currently in the process of jury selection and hearing pre-trial motions.

Deputy District Attorney Marlene Martinez said the woman told Gibson about the incident during a massage she gave Gibson.

Gibson had said Jane Doe 3 had a “PTSD reaction” when he brought up the name “Harvey.”

Trending:

Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit

Judge Lisa B. Lench rejected arguments from Weinstein’s lawyers who did not want Gibson to testify.

Mark Werksman, who represents Weinstein, said Gibson should not be allowed to testify because he dislikes Weinstein, according to Deadline.

“Shortly after (Gibson’s film ‘The Passion of the Christ’) came out, Mr. Weinstein’s publishing company, Miramax Books, put out a book called ‘Perspectives on Passion of the Christ’ debunking the movie’s anti-Semitic overtones and false depiction of the Jews.”

Will the upcoming trial see more convictions for Weinstein?

Yes: 0% (0 Votes)

No: 0% (0 Votes)

“This created a feud between Mr. Gibson and [Mr.] Weinstein. Mr. Weinstein is Jewish … Mr. Gibson knew that,” Werksman said.

“Any evidence of Mr. Gibson’s racism or anti-Semitism would give rise to a bias against my client, who challenged him,” he said.

Lench and Werkman sparred over Werkman’s request that other comments from Gibson he called racist be allowed to be used.

“How is it relevant if he’s racist toward African Americans or Latinos?” Lench asked, according to Variety.

“It goes to his unwillingness to grant equal status to someone who is not of his ilk. He has a white-supremacist view,” Werksman said. “Someone with white-supremacist values might have no problem perjuring himself against a Jewish defendant.”

Lench said the defense could ask Gibson about animosity toward Weinstein, but not touch upon anti-Semitic remarks Gibson made in 2006.

Related:

Harvey Weinstein’s…
Source

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *